Leave a Message

Thank you for your message. We will be in touch with you shortly.

Beverly Or The South Suburbs: Where To Live?

Beverly Or The South Suburbs: Where To Live?

Trying to choose between Beverly and the South Suburbs can feel harder than it should. On paper, they may all offer detached homes, rail access, and strong owner occupancy, but the day-to-day experience can be very different. If you are weighing city character against suburban convenience, this guide will help you compare housing style, commuting patterns, and affordability signals so you can decide what fits your life best. Let’s dive in.

Start With Your Daily Priorities

The best place to live is not just about price or square footage. It is about how you want your week to feel, how you plan to commute, and what type of home environment feels right when you pull onto your block.

Beverly is the Chicago option in this comparison, while Homewood, Flossmoor, and Orland Park represent different South Suburban lifestyles. Based on CMAP’s updated community snapshots, the biggest differences come down to home style, age of housing stock, transit access, and combined housing-plus-transportation costs.

Beverly at a Glance

If you want a neighborhood that feels like a village within the city, Beverly stands out. CMAP’s Beverly snapshot shows that 78.6% of housing units are detached single-family homes, the median year built is 1941, and 47.5% of homes were built before 1940.

That older housing stock shapes the look and feel of the area. The median home has 7.4 rooms, and Choose Chicago describes Beverly as a place with tree-lined streets, large lots, and architecturally significant homes. If you want historic Chicago character without giving up detached-home living, Beverly offers a very specific niche.

How the South Suburbs Compare

The South Suburbs are not one-size-fits-all. Homewood, Flossmoor, and Orland Park each bring a different housing mix and lifestyle pattern.

Homewood: The Middle Ground

Homewood’s CMAP snapshot shows a housing profile that looks close to Beverly in one key way: 78.7% of homes are detached single-family. The difference is age and style. Homewood’s median year built is 1962, and 55.2% of homes were built from 1940 to 1969.

That points to a more mid-century suburban feel. The median home has 6.5 rooms, so you still get a detached-home environment, but generally with newer housing stock than Beverly.

Flossmoor: More Space, Higher Cost

Flossmoor’s CMAP snapshot shows the most detached-home-heavy market in this group at 84.7%. It also has the largest median home size by room count at 7.9 rooms, with a median year built of 1967.

If your main goal is spacious detached housing, Flossmoor deserves a close look. Nearly half of its homes were built from 1940 to 1969, which supports that established suburban feel, but the affordability tradeoff is important, and we will cover that below.

Orland Park: Newer and More Mixed

Orland Park’s CMAP snapshot shows the newest and most mixed housing stock in this comparison. It is 57.5% detached single-family and 21.1% single-family attached, with a median year built of 1988.

In practical terms, that suggests more subdivision-era homes, townhomes, and newer construction options than you will usually find in Beverly, Homewood, or Flossmoor. If you prefer a more modern housing mix or want attached-home options, Orland Park may line up better with your search.

Compare Housing Style Side by Side

Area Detached Single-Family Median Year Built Median Rooms
Beverly 78.6% 1941 7.4
Homewood 78.7% 1962 6.5
Flossmoor 84.7% 1967 7.9
Orland Park 57.5% 1988 Not listed

This is where your personal taste matters. Beverly tends to fit buyers who want historic architecture and a city location. Homewood offers a similar detached-home profile with a more classic suburban housing era. Flossmoor leans toward larger detached homes, and Orland Park appeals to buyers who want newer or more varied housing types.

Commute Style Can Change the Decision

For many buyers, the real tie-breaker is not the house. It is the commute.

Beverly is served by several Rock Island stations, including 91st St./Beverly Hills, 99th St./Beverly Hills, and 103rd St./Beverly Hills. The station setup supports rail access within the city, and the 91st and 103rd stations list CTA connections.

Homewood is on the Metra Electric line and is also an Amtrak stop. Its station page lists Pace routes 356 and 359, along with 518 parking spaces. That makes it a strong option if you want commuter rail access with a more suburban station setup.

Flossmoor is also on the Metra Electric line and lists 275 parking spaces, which still supports rail commuting but on a smaller parking scale than Homewood. Orland Park is much more park-and-ride oriented, with 143rd Street listing 417 parking spaces and 153rd Street listing 1,364 parking spaces, plus Pace connections.

What the Numbers Say About Commuting

CMAP’s commute data adds useful context. Beverly records 15.3% transit commuters and a 30.4-minute mean commute. Homewood has 11.3% transit commuters and a 31.6-minute mean commute.

Flossmoor records 14.5% transit commuters, a 33.7% work-from-home rate, and a 38.4-minute mean commute. Orland Park shows just 3.7% transit commuters and a 33.7-minute mean commute, which makes it the most car-dependent option in this group.

Annual vehicle miles traveled per household reinforce the same trend. Beverly comes in at 14,713, Homewood at 15,790, Orland Park at 16,363, and Flossmoor at 18,188. If you want a more transit-oriented lifestyle, Beverly and Flossmoor stand out most in this set, while Orland Park leans clearly toward driving.

Affordability Is More Than the Mortgage

One of the most useful data points in this comparison is CMAP’s housing-plus-transportation affordability index. This matters because two places with similar home prices can still feel very different once commuting and driving costs are added in.

CMAP estimates that a median-income family spends 40% of income on housing and transportation in Beverly and Homewood. That same measure rises to 48% in Orland Park and 53% in Flossmoor. CMAP uses 45% as the affordability threshold, so Beverly and Homewood come in strongest on this measure.

For moderate-income families, the pattern is similar. Beverly and Homewood are both at 49%, Orland Park is 58%, and Flossmoor is 65%. If you are budget-conscious and want to keep your total monthly lifestyle costs in check, Beverly and Homewood may offer the best balance in this group.

Owner Occupancy and Market Feel

All four communities are strongly owner-oriented, but the mix still tells you something about the market. Beverly is 83.7% owner-occupied, Homewood is 79.4%, Orland Park is 86.2%, and Flossmoor is 95.9%.

That does not tell you everything about a place, but it does show that each market is largely shaped by homeowners rather than renters. Flossmoor is the most owner-dominated of the group, while Beverly and Homewood still maintain very strong ownership rates.

Which Area Fits Your Goals?

If you are still deciding, this quick breakdown can help narrow your search.

Choose Beverly If You Want

  • Historic Chicago character
  • Detached homes with a large-lot feel
  • Older architecture and larger room counts
  • Rail access without leaving the city

Choose Homewood If You Want

  • A strong middle-ground option
  • Mostly detached homes with a suburban feel
  • Mid-century housing stock
  • Metra Electric access plus Amtrak service
  • A housing-plus-transportation profile similar to Beverly

Choose Flossmoor If You Want

  • The highest share of detached homes
  • Larger homes by room count
  • An established suburban setting
  • A market where ownership is especially dominant

Choose Orland Park If You Want

  • Newer housing stock
  • A mix of detached and attached homes
  • More subdivision-style housing choices
  • A car-first commute pattern with substantial station parking

The Best Choice Depends on Your Lifestyle

There is no one right answer between Beverly and the South Suburbs. Beverly offers historic city-neighborhood appeal with strong rail access and a detached-home feel that is unusual within Chicago. Homewood gives you a practical middle ground, Flossmoor offers more spacious detached housing with a higher cost burden, and Orland Park stands out for newer housing and a more car-oriented suburban setup.

If you want help narrowing your options based on commute, housing style, and total monthly cost, connect with Christina Horne. You will get local, hands-on guidance tailored to the way you actually want to live.

FAQs

Is Beverly or Homewood more affordable when housing and transportation are combined?

  • According to CMAP, Beverly and Homewood are tied, with a median-income family estimated to spend 40% of income on housing and transportation.

Is Orland Park or Beverly better for newer homes?

  • Orland Park has newer housing stock overall, with a median year built of 1988, compared with Beverly’s median year built of 1941.

Is Flossmoor or Beverly better for larger homes?

  • Based on CMAP room-count data, Flossmoor has the larger median home size at 7.9 rooms, compared with Beverly at 7.4 rooms.

Is Beverly or Orland Park better for transit commuters?

  • Beverly is more transit-oriented in this comparison, with 15.3% of commuters using transit versus 3.7% in Orland Park.

Which South Suburb is the closest match to Beverly?

  • Homewood is the closest middle-ground match based on detached-home share, similar combined housing-and-transportation costs, and commuter rail access.

Work With Us

Whether buying or selling, our team delivers expert guidance and proven results across the Chicago area.

Follow Us on Instagram